According to a new Gallup poll on baby gender preferences, people in the U.S. show a slight baby gender preference for having a boy instead of a girl if they were only able to have one child. The telephone poll was conducted last month and included roughly 1,000 American adults. The participants’ baby gender preferences in Stats:
# Boy: 37%
# Girl: 28%
# Either/doesn’t matter: 26%
# Not sure/no opinion: 9%
According to a news article in the Irish Independent, the pressure for young mothers to breastfeed has never been greater in the U.K. Female politicians such as Jemima Khan are adding to the debate, calling breast milk the “21st century superfood”; on the other side parenting magazines refer to breast milk as ‘nectar’. More
LOS ANGELES, May 15 (UPI) — Being born in a baby-friendly hospital increases the chance the infant will be breastfed for six months, found a study of inner-city U.S. hospitals.
The research for the International Lactation Consultant Association, published in the Journal of Human Lactation, found that the rates of breastfeeding at six months decreased for families with public insurance or if there was an early feeding problem.
The study found that those mothers who gave birth in a baby-friendly hospital breastfed at rates comparable to the overall U.S. population, suggesting that the baby-friendly initiatives were positively affecting the health of those babies.
They looked at the factors influencing a mother’s decision to begin to breastfeed while in the hospital and what influenced whether that baby was still being nursed at six months.
The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative was established by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund to help the participating hospitals become centers of breastfeeding support.
Del.icio.us | Digg it | RSS
© Copyright 2007 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
United Press International, UPI, the UPI logo, and other trademarks and service marks, are registered or unregistered trademarks of United Press International, Inc. in the United States and in other countries.
Beware the idiot box
By Susie O’Brien
May 01, 2007 01:00am
Article from: Herald-Sun
CHILDREN can be harmed by television even if they are not watching it, medical experts say.
Australian developmental pediatrician Dr John Wray said evidence showed a loud TV on in the background could delay young children’s language development.
The warning comes as calls mount for TV rationing and total bans on TV for under-threes.
“TV being on in the background 24/7 can be harmful, because children learn to tune out human voices, which can mean a delay in the processing of one-on-one voices,” Dr Wray said.
“This can be particularly damaging for kids with a predisposition to autism who may be drawn to the television,” he said.
“In many households, children fall asleep in front of the television and turn it on first thing in the morning.
“By the time children finish school, many spend more time in front of the TV than they do at school,” he said.
He advised parents to gradually reduce the time the TV is on, and increase one-on-one interaction.
In Britain this week, Dr Aric Sigman, from the British Psychological Society, said TV rationing was the “greatest priority for child health”.
He believes no child under three should watch TV, children should not be allowed to have TV sets in their bedrooms and that governments should provide guidance on how much TV children should watch.
Dr Sigman believes there are 15 ways in which over-exposure to TV can harm children, including by fuelling obesity and short-sightedness and causing premature puberty and autism.
Dr Sigman says three- to seven-year-olds should watch only half an hour of TV a day, and children aged seven to 12 up to an hour. Children aged 12 to 15 should watch no more than 1½ hours, and over-16s two hours.
Dr Wray said he thought blanket bans were unnecessary, but welcomed the guidelines for older children.
“When it comes to television, the content is important. And the more children are extended by it the better,” he said.
Debra Richards, the CEO of the Australian Subscription TV and Radio Association, disagreed that TV was harmful to children.
“Television is a valued medium which provides content specifically aimed at children,” she said.
“It’s about choice and diversity, and children like it because they want to be entertained and informed,” she said.
She said parental supervision allowed children to safely watch programs designed for them.